COMPLETED STUDY:
GASTRO
GASTRO
Research Details
Detailed study information
Full study title
Gastroenteritis Aggressive Versus Slow Treatment for Rehydration (GASTRO): A Phase II Rehydration Trial for Severe Dehydration—WHO Plan C Versus Slow Rehydration
Study overview
Acute gastroenteritis can cause substantial losses of water and electrolytes through diarrhoea and vomiting. Without timely treatment, affected children may develop severe dehydration, circulatory failure, organ dysfunction or death.
The World Health Organization’s Plan C recommends rapid intravenous rehydration for children with severe dehydration. However, before the GASTRO Study, the safety and effectiveness of this strategy had not been formally evaluated in a randomised clinical trial in African hospitals.
Concerns about rapid fluid administration had also increased following the FEAST trial, which found that fluid boluses increased mortality among children with severe infections and impaired circulation. GASTRO therefore compared the standard WHO Plan C regimen with a simpler and slower intravenous rehydration strategy.
Study objectives
The study aimed to:
- Compare the safety of rapid and slow intravenous rehydration in children with severe dehydration caused by gastroenteritis.
- Determine whether a slower eight-hour regimen increased serious adverse events.
- Compare the speed of recovery from clinical signs of dehydration.
- Assess the effects of the two strategies on cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological outcomes.
- Evaluate how easily the treatment protocols could be implemented in resource-limited hospitals.
- Generate evidence for the design of larger clinical trials of childhood rehydration.
Study design
GASTRO was a multicentre, open-label, Phase II randomised controlled trial.
A total of 122 children were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two intravenous rehydration strategies:
- Standard WHO Plan C rehydration; or
- Slower intravenous rehydration over eight hours.
The study originally planned to enrol approximately 120 participants and ultimately recruited 122 children. The primary analysis compared serious adverse events occurring during the first 48 hours after randomisation. BMC Medicine
Study population
Participants were children who:
- Were aged between 2 months and 12 years.
- Were admitted to hospital with acute gastroenteritis.
- Had diarrhoea, with or without vomiting.
- Had clinical signs of severe dehydration.
- Required intravenous rehydration.
Unlike the subsequent GASTROSAM trial, GASTRO focused on children with severe dehydration who did not have severe acute malnutrition.
Study locations
The study was conducted at hospitals in Uganda and Kenya, including:
- Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda
- Soroti Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda
- Kilifi County Hospital, Kenya
Mbale Clinical Research Institute supported the implementation of the Ugandan component of the study.
Study interventions
WHO Plan C rehydration
Children allocated to WHO Plan C received Ringer’s lactate at a total volume of 100 ml/kg:
- Over three hours for children aged one year or older.
- Over six hours for infants younger than one year.
The protocol also permitted 0.9% saline boluses for children who met the study criteria for shock.
Slow rehydration
Children allocated to the experimental strategy received:
- Ringer’s lactate at a total volume of 100 ml/kg.
- Administration over eight hours, irrespective of age.
- No additional rapid fluid boluses.
After completing intravenous rehydration, children continued to receive oral fluids and routine clinical care as appropriate.
Main outcomes assessed
The primary outcome was the occurrence of serious adverse events within 48 hours, including:
- Cardiovascular complications
- Respiratory complications
- Neurological complications
- Fluid-overload events
- Death
Secondary outcomes included:
- Resolution of clinical signs of dehydration.
- Time taken for the child to tolerate oral fluids.
- Time to hospital discharge.
- Urine output.
- Changes in body weight.
- Electrolyte abnormalities.
- Requirement for additional treatment.
- Cardiac biomarkers associated with cardiac strain or injury.
- Practical adherence to the two rehydration protocols.
Key findings
The study found that slower rehydration over eight hours was as safe as WHO Plan C.
Important findings included:
- Serious adverse events were similar between the two treatment groups.
- Four children died during the study—two in each treatment group.
- There was no evidence that the slower regimen increased fluid overload, cardiovascular complications or other serious adverse events.
- Both strategies produced similar resolution of dehydration.
- The time taken to tolerate oral fluids was similar between the groups.
- Length of hospital stay was also comparable.
- The slower protocol was simpler for healthcare workers to implement.
- The two-step WHO Plan C regimen required continuing staff training to maintain correct implementation.
The investigators concluded that slower rehydration using 100 ml/kg of Ringer’s lactate over eight hours appeared safe and was easier to implement than the standard age-dependent Plan C regimen. However, the trial was not large enough to establish whether either treatment reduced mortality. PubMed
Importance of the study
GASTRO was among the first randomised trials to formally evaluate WHO Plan C against an alternative intravenous rehydration strategy in African children with severe dehydration.
The study demonstrated that a simpler eight-hour regimen could achieve similar clinical outcomes without increasing serious adverse events. A uniform regimen that does not change according to age may also be easier for healthcare workers to administer correctly, particularly in busy or resource-limited hospitals.
The study generated essential feasibility and safety evidence for larger trials. It also helped inform the design of the later GASTROSAM trial, which investigated oral and intravenous rehydration in children with severe acute malnutrition.
Study leadership and collaborators
The research team included investigators from:
- Mbale Clinical Research Institute
- Mbale Regional Referral Hospital
- Soroti Regional Referral Hospital
- KEMRI–Wellcome Trust Research Programme
- Imperial College London
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London
- University Hospital of Wales
Key investigators included:
- Professor Kathryn Maitland
- Professor Peter Olupot-Olupot
- Dr Kirsty Houston
- Jack Gibb
- Margaret Nakuya
- Rita Muhindo
- Dr Nchafatso Obonyo
- Ayub Mpoya
- Professor Diana Gibb
- Elizabeth George
- Roisin Connon
- Jennifer Evans
- Sophie Uyoga
Professor Peter Olupot-Olupot led and supervised the study activities undertaken through Mbale Clinical Research Institute and Mbale Regional Referral Hospital.
Funding
The research was supported through Wellcome-funded clinical research programmes and fellowships, including grants associated with Imperial College London and the KEMRI–Wellcome Trust Research Programme.
The publication reports support through Wellcome grant references including:
- 105603/Z/14/Z
- 100693/Z/12/Z
- 097816/Z/11/A
Ethics and trial registration
The study received ethics and regulatory approval from the relevant committees and national authorities in Uganda, Kenya and the United Kingdom.
The Imperial College Research Ethics Committee reference was:
- ICREC 16IC3388
The study was registered as:
- ISRCTN: ISRCTN67518332
Parents or legal guardians provided informed consent before children were enrolled.
Study status
Completed
The study completed participant recruitment and follow-up before publication of its principal findings in July 2019.
Selected publications
- Houston KA, Gibb JG, Olupot-Olupot P, et al. Gastroenteritis Aggressive Versus Slow Treatment for Rehydration (GASTRO): A Phase II Rehydration Trial for Severe Dehydration—WHO Plan C Versus Slow Rehydration. BMC Medicine. 2019;17:122. Read the publication
- Houston KA, Gibb JG, Mpoya A, et al. Gastroenteritis Aggressive Versus Slow Treatment for Rehydration (GASTRO): A Pilot Rehydration Study for Severe Dehydration—WHO Plan C Versus Slower Rehydration. Wellcome Open Research. 2017;2:62. Read the study protocol
Study Summary
GASTRO Study – Gastroenteritis Aggressive Versus Slow Treatment for Rehydration
The GASTRO Study investigated whether slower intravenous rehydration could be safely used in children with severe dehydration caused by gastroenteritis. The Phase II trial enrolled 122 children at hospitals in Uganda and Kenya, including Mbale Regional Referral Hospital. It compared standard WHO Plan C rehydration with an eight-hour regimen using 100 mL/kg of Ringer’s lactate. Serious adverse events, mortality and recovery from dehydration were similar between groups. The study found that slower rehydration appeared safe and was simpler to implement, providing important evidence for larger trials and informing subsequent research on rehydration in severely malnourished children.