COMPLETED STUDY:
MIMBLE II
MIMBLE II
Research Details
MIMBLE Study
Full title
Modifying Intestinal Integrity and Microbiome in Malnutrition with Legume-Based Feeds
The research programme included an initial pilot study, followed by the larger MIMBLE 2.0 Phase II trial.
Study overview
Severe acute malnutrition remains an important cause of childhood illness and death in sub-Saharan Africa. Standard treatment includes therapeutic milk feeds known as F75 and F100. Although these feeds support weight gain, they may not fully address the damage that severe malnutrition causes to the intestines and gut microbiome.
Children with severe malnutrition commonly experience intestinal inflammation, disruption of normal gut bacteria, lactose intolerance and impaired intestinal-barrier function. These problems may contribute to diarrhoea, poor nutrient absorption, bloodstream infections, treatment failure and death.
The MIMBLE Study investigated whether lactose-free, legume-enriched feeds containing fermentable carbohydrates could improve intestinal health while providing safe and effective nutritional rehabilitation.
Study rationale
The intestinal microbiome is the community of microorganisms that lives within the digestive system. A healthy microbiome supports digestion, immunity, nutrient production and protection against disease-causing organisms.
Severe malnutrition can reduce microbial diversity and weaken the intestinal barrier. This may allow harmful bacteria or bacterial products to cross from the intestines into the bloodstream, increasing the risk of severe infection.
Legumes contain resistant starches and other fermentable carbohydrates. Gut bacteria can ferment these carbohydrates to produce short-chain fatty acids, which may:
- Provide energy to intestinal cells.
- Strengthen the intestinal barrier.
- Support beneficial gut bacteria.
- Regulate inflammation.
- Improve nutrient absorption.
- Protect against disease-causing organisms.
Study objectives
The study aimed to:
- Determine whether legume-enriched therapeutic feeds were safe and acceptable.
- Compare nutritional recovery with standard WHO therapeutic feeds.
- Assess whether the modified feeds improved intestinal-barrier function.
- Examine changes in gut microbial diversity and composition.
- Measure the production of beneficial short-chain fatty acids.
- Assess intestinal inflammation and injury.
- Determine whether lactose-free feeds reduced the development or duration of diarrhoea.
- Compare survival and hospital readmission between feeding strategies.
- Generate evidence for larger clinical trials of improved nutritional feeds.
Initial MIMBLE pilot study
The initial MIMBLE pilot study was a three-group clinical trial involving 58 Ugandan children with severe acute malnutrition.
Participants received one of the following:
- A cowpea-enriched therapeutic feed
- An inulin-containing therapeutic feed
- Conventional WHO therapeutic feeds
The pilot study assessed safety, weight gain, mortality, resolution of nutritional oedema, intestinal permeability, gut inflammation, microbial diversity and production of short-chain fatty acids.
Findings from the pilot study
Weight gain, mortality and resolution of nutritional oedema were generally similar across the three feeding groups.
However, children receiving conventional feeds experienced a reduction in gut bacterial richness during the first seven days of treatment. This reduction was not observed among children receiving the cowpea-enriched feed.
The findings suggested that legume-enriched feeds could help preserve microbial diversity and intestinal fermentation during antibiotic treatment without compromising nutritional recovery. These results supported the development of the refined feed evaluated in MIMBLE 2.0. Read the published pilot-study results.
MIMBLE 2.0 study design
MIMBLE 2.0 was an open-label, proof-of-principle Phase II randomised controlled trial.
A total of 160 children were randomly assigned in equal proportions to receive either:
- A lactose-free, chickpea-enriched therapeutic feed; or
- Standard WHO F75 and F100 therapeutic milk feeds.
The investigational feed was designed to provide comparable amounts of energy and protein while supplying fermentable carbohydrates from chickpea flour.
Study population
MIMBLE 2.0 enrolled Ugandan children hospitalised with severe acute malnutrition.
Severe malnutrition was defined as:
- Marasmus: mid-upper arm circumference below 11.5 cm;
- Kwashiorkor: symmetrical pitting oedema involving at least the feet; or
- A combination of wasting and nutritional oedema.
Children with terminal illnesses, malignant disease or other conditions associated with an extremely high risk of death were excluded.
The enrolled children had a median age of approximately 17 months. More than half presented with oedematous malnutrition.
Study site
The MIMBLE research programme was conducted in Eastern Uganda, principally at:
- Mbale Regional Referral Hospital
- Mbale Clinical Research Institute
The MIMBLE 2.0 protocol initially included Mbale and Soroti Regional Referral Hospitals. The reported Phase II trial was conducted at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital.
Study interventions
Standard WHO feeds
Children in the control group received F75 therapeutic milk during the stabilisation phase, followed by F100 during nutritional rehabilitation.
Legume-enriched feed
Children in the intervention group received a specially developed lactose-free nutritional paste enriched with chickpea flour.
The feed was designed to:
- Provide energy and protein comparable to standard therapeutic feeds.
- Reduce exposure to lactose.
- Supply fermentable carbohydrates.
- Promote beneficial intestinal bacteria.
- Increase short-chain fatty-acid production.
- Support intestinal-barrier repair.
All participants continued to receive standard inpatient management, including antibiotics, antimalarial medicines and other treatments when clinically indicated.
Study outcomes
The co-primary outcomes were:
- Change in mid-upper arm circumference by day 90
- Survival to day 90
Secondary outcomes included:
- Weight gain
- Achievement of weight gain greater than 5 g/kg per day
- Development of new diarrhoea
- Time to resolution of diarrhoea
- Time to resolution of nutritional oedema
- Hospital readmission
- Serious adverse events
- Changes in intestinal inflammation
- Changes in gut microbial composition
- Production of short-chain fatty acids
- Changes in host and microbial metabolism
Children were assessed during hospitalisation and followed until days 28 and 90.
Main MIMBLE 2.0 findings
Nutritional recovery was similar between the two study groups. By day 90, the median increase in mid-upper arm circumference was:
- 1.1 cm in the legume-feed group
- 1.4 cm in the standard WHO-feed group
The difference was not statistically significant.
Day-90 mortality was also similar:
- 11 of 80 children in the legume-feed group
- 12 of 80 children in the standard-feed group
There were no significant differences in weight gain, development or resolution of diarrhoea, resolution of oedema or hospital readmission.
A per-protocol analysis showed numerically lower mortality and readmission among children who completed the legume-feed intervention, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Safety and acceptability
The legume-based feed produced nutritional outcomes comparable to standard WHO feeds, with no evidence of increased clinical harm.
However, some children initially found the nutritional paste less acceptable than liquid therapeutic milk. Ten children assigned to the legume-feed group were switched to standard WHO feeds because of poor early tolerance, feeding difficulty or clinical deterioration.
The study therefore demonstrated the importance of improving the taste, texture and ease of administration of future legume-based formulations.
Interpretation of the findings
The study showed that lactose-free, chickpea-enriched feeds could support nutritional recovery comparable to standard WHO therapeutic feeds. The intervention did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in survival, mid-upper arm circumference, diarrhoea or readmission.
Nevertheless, the study provided proof that legume-based feeds can be developed and used safely in children with severe malnutrition. The findings also identified practical improvements required before conducting larger clinical trials, particularly regarding palatability and suitability during the early stabilisation phase.
The Phase II findings were initially reported as a preprint and should therefore be described as preliminary until publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Read the MIMBLE 2.0 Phase II report.
Importance of the study
MIMBLE moved beyond measuring weight gain alone and examined the biological processes underlying recovery from severe malnutrition.
The study contributed important knowledge about:
- Intestinal damage in severe malnutrition
- The role of the gut microbiome in recovery
- Fermentation of dietary carbohydrates
- Lactose intolerance during severe illness
- Development of culturally relevant therapeutic feeds
- Clinical testing of locally available legumes
- Nutritional interventions that may reduce infection and poor outcomes
The programme demonstrated the value of combining paediatric clinical research with nutrition science, microbiology, metabolomics and food-product development.
Study leadership
The MIMBLE 2.0 protocol identified:
- Professor Gary Frost – Principal Investigator
- Professor Peter Olupot-Olupot – Co-Principal Investigator and Mbale research lead
- Professor Kathryn Maitland – Co-Principal Investigator
- Dr Kevin Walsh – Co-Principal Investigator
The Mbale-based research team included William Okiror, Tonny Ssenyondo, Charles Benard Okalebo and Rita Muhindo, together with clinical, nursing, nutrition and laboratory staff.
Collaborating institutions
Participating and collaborating institutions included:
- Mbale Clinical Research Institute
- Mbale Regional Referral Hospital
- Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences
- Imperial College London
- King’s College London
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
- University of Glasgow
- University of Reading
Funding
MIMBLE 2.0 was supported through the Confidence in Concept Joint Translational Fund 2017 at Imperial College London.
Ethical approval and consent
MIMBLE 2.0 received ethical approval from:
- Imperial College Research Ethics Committee: 17IC4146
- Mbale Regional Referral Hospital Research Ethics Committee: COM 019/2018
Written informed consent was obtained from parents or legal guardians. An approved deferred-consent process was available for emergency situations where completing the full consent procedure could have delayed urgent treatment.
Trial registration
MIMBLE 2.0 was registered as:
ISRCTN10309022
The initial MIMBLE pilot study was registered as:
PACTR201805003381361
Study status
The MIMBLE pilot study and MIMBLE 2.0 Phase II trial are completed.
MIMBLE 2.0 recruited 160 children between July 2018 and August 2019. The pilot-study findings were published in a peer-reviewed journal in 2021, while the Phase II findings were made available as a research preprint in 2023.
Key publications




Study Summary
MIMBLE Study – Modifying Intestinal Integrity and Microbiome in Malnutrition with Legume-Based Feeds
The MIMBLE research programme investigated whether legume-enriched, lactose-free therapeutic feeds could improve recovery from severe acute malnutrition by supporting intestinal health and the gut microbiome. Following a pilot study involving 58 Ugandan children, the MIMBLE 2.0 Phase II trial enrolled 160 children at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital. The trial compared a chickpea-enriched feed with standard WHO therapeutic feeds. Nutritional recovery and survival were similar between groups, demonstrating that legume-based feeds can be used safely while highlighting the need to improve palatability and early feeding tolerance.